Entrenamiento de resiliencia
ModerateConditionalin favorRecommendation: Se sugiere el entrenamiento de resiliencia.
Why / when / how
Resilience training improves psychological resilience consistently, with a low risk of harm. The certainty of the evidence in the critical outcomes is moderate. That is why the recommendation is conditional in favor: the balance between benefits and risks favors the intervention, even though the conditional strength reflects an effect of small to moderate magnitude and the risk of bias from self-reported outcomes.
Cautions
Before intervening on mental health, assess the patient's emotional state, context, and treatments, and individualize the approach without replacing the treatment indicated by their health team. Carry out a screening of suicide risk and crisis situations. Advise seeking mental-health care on a priority basis in the face of warning signs such as thoughts of self-harm, marked functional decline, and worsening symptoms, and refer to specialized care when appropriate. Reassess the progression periodically.
Quantitative evidence
Member content
The full version of this entry includes
Available to members of partner societies.
FITT-VP dose
Evidence to decision
Net balance
Decision threshold
Evidence profile · 1 outcome assessed
1 source with verified citation